Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict: A Review and Test of their Relation to Job Outcomes

Authors

  • Saad A. Al-Kelabi King Saud University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34120/ajas.v15i2.693

Keywords:

Role ambiguity, Role conflict, Job satisfaction, Organizational loyalty, Rizzo scale

Abstract

This study reviews and investigate the relationships of role ambiguity and conflict with job outcomes. A sample of (175) Saudi employees working in a Saudi Arabian service organization completed a questionnaire. The results show a significant relationships between both roles and general job satisfaction, as well as, job problems. Furthermore, only role conflict shows significant relationship with job commitment. However, both role ambiguity and conflict show no significant relationships with both subordinate performance and supervisor's satisfaction with that performance. These results reflect the results from previous studies. The findings of this study, therefore, indicate that there is a universal validity of role theories developed in the U.S.A.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Saad A. Al-Kelabi, King Saud University

Ph.D. in Business Administration, specialization in Human Resources and Organizational Behavior, State University of New York, Buffalo, USA, 1991. Associate Professor at Department of Business Administration, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh. He has research interests in the fields of human resources management and organization, Administrative leadership, organizational behavior, and business administration.

Published

2008

How to Cite

Al-Kelabi, S. A. (2008). Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict: A Review and Test of their Relation to Job Outcomes. Arab Journal of Administrative Sciences, 15(2), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.34120/ajas.v15i2.693

Issue

Section

Management